Tuesday, May 26, 2009

What is so original about the Sambhaar?

Last night’s dinner menu was – saadham (rice), mullangi (radish) sambhaar, kootu with peerkangai (ridge gourd) and sorakkai (bottle gourd), kathirikkai podimas (brinjal dry preparation with lentils), beans poriyal (dry side dish) and a salad of cucumber, carrot and baby mangoes. Cooking all this was simple enough. Following mom’s instructions, that is.


Heat oil in a pan, add asafoetida, a few fenugreek seeds, throw in chopped onions, let them turn pink, add pounded garlic, add 1-2 green chillies, add radish and fry a while. Add chunks of chopped tomatoes, salt, turmeric, sambhaar powder, amchur (dry mango powder instead of tamarind) and water. Let it boil down till radish is cooked and the raw smell of the sambhar powder vanishes. Add boiled toor dal (pigeon pea) and let boil again. Heat oil in a separate pan, pop mustard seeds, curry leaves and add to the cooked sambhaar. Garnish with chopped coriander leaves. It is that easy...


The Sambhaar took the longest time among all dishes – as it brewed and bubbled in the pot, I started thinking. How did this all begin?

According to the Wikipedia,

· Tomatoes came from South America. Known to the Aztecs somewhere near 500 BC, it took a long route to India. The Spanish took it to their colonies in Caribbean and on to the Philippines from where it reached South East Asia, probably including India. This was not until the 1500’s at least.

· Radish was domesticated in Europe in pre-Roman times but there is no way to determine its earlier history and domestication.

· Pigeon pea’s cultivation happened at 3000 years back somewhere in Asia.

· In Bronze Age settlements, onion remains were found alongside fig and date stones dating back to 5000 BC. There is also postulation that cultivation probably took place around 2000 years later in ancient Egypt.

· Chillies originated in the Americas and have been a part of the human diet since at least 7500 BC. After Christopher Columbus’ expedition, chillies quickly conquered the globe taking Mexico and Philippines enroute to India. Or, it came to India via Spain with help from the Portuguese.

· Coriander is native to Southwestern Asia and west to North Africa.

· Fenugreek seeds are believed to have been brought into cultivation in the Near East. Charred fenugreek seeds have been recovered from Tell Halal, Iraq, (radio carbon dating to 4000 BC) and as well as desiccated seeds from the tomb of Tutankhamen.

· Tamarind – is native to Africa, including Sudan and parts of Madagascar. But, the name is very Indian Tamar Hindi = Indian date, although it was known to ancient Egyptians and to the Greeks in the 4th Century BC.

· Oh, there is something original to India in the sambhaar – the curry leaves, which most South Indians use it only for flavouring and never consume, setting them aside in their plates.

· And, the turmeric of which only a pinch is used – is native to tropical South Asia. Patents may have been granted to the turmeric in the Western World but it belongs to India.

Well, what is so original about the sambhaar then that South Indians salivate at its mention and swell with pride? Most of the ingredients didn’t originate in South India and not at least until the 1600s. So, some 400 years ago, there was a darn good chef, an unsung hero, who threw all these together to make the brown broth that conquered the native palates. He had pioneered the various uses of Sambhaar. Mix it in rice and eat with a vegetable dish, or eat the sambhaar with idlis and dosas or dunk some vadas in it. It is as South Indian as you can get it.


You think so? Not quite. A year ago, a charming 4 year old came to my Guragon home. I was to baby sit her while her mother needed the time to get her chores done. As the evening drew near, I called out to my maid and said, “Please get the sambhaar (sam pronounced like calm and bhaar like car) ready.” The kid quickly corrected me, “No Aunty, it is Sambhaar (bhaar pronounced like burr).” I tried correcting her right back, “No honey, it is Sambhaar,” emphasising on prolonging the last phonetic. She wouldn’t hear any of it. We went back and forth correcting each other. Finally, I told her, “Sambhaar comes from where I belong, so it has to be said the way I say so.” She was quite for a while after. When the bell rang an hour later and it was her mother at the door, off she ran. Just as the mother entered, the kid asked her mother, “Ma, hamare waale India mein Samburr bolte hain na?” In our India, don’t we call it Samburr?


Really, what is so original or South Indian about Sambhaar or Samburr?

5 comments:

  1. If I am not wrong, Sambhaar originated in Karnataka and more specifically, Udipi. In Tamil Nadu its equivalent is Kozhambu. In Andhra, it's Pulusu. And in Kerala, it's… it's… it's… maybe Meen Curry? In the North, it's something that is first put on rice and then mixed with the vegetables, chutneys and maybe some curd and eaten as one giant stew. (Shudder!)

    But you're right. It's something to drool on…

    ReplyDelete
  2. Saambhar is made in differnt ways in differnt places. Saambhar in mumbai has sugar added to it. Take Saambhar in Chennai and in Coimbatore. Coimbatore Saambhar will have more tamarind added to it.

    Sridhar: What Kozhambu & Pulusu have to do with Saambahar???

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wherever the ingredients came from, it was put together to form this lip-msacking concotion, Jai Ho!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am not Sure about who invented Sambhar first, But for sure Kozhambu and Sambhar are different varieties. The major difference is Sambhar was a Veggie broth ab ovo, whereas Kozhambu can be non-veggie too. Both of them differ by its concotion. In Sambhar you have lentils with other spices added and in Kozhambu one doesn't use Lentils and the main ingredient is Tamarind. Whatever it is both of them are droolingly delicious concocts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have similar stroy to tell ,but bit serious one ...ENJOY READING THE STORY AND THE SOURCE BOOK- THE ASCENT OF MONEY BY NIALL FERGUSOPN-THANKS !

    THE ASCENT OF MONEY –THE FINANCIAL HISTORY OF THE WORLD

    Bread ,cash,dosh,dough,loot,lucre,moolah, readies , the where-withal : call it what you like ,money matters .To Christians ,the love of it is the root of all evil .To generals , it is the sinews of war ; to the revolutionaries ,the shackles of labour . But what exactly is money.
    Is it a mountain of silver as Spanish, conquistadors thought? Are will mere clay tablets and printed paper suffice? How did come to live in a world where most money is invisible, little more than numbers on a computer screen? Where did money come from and where did all go.

    Last year -2007 the income of the average American ( just under 34$) went up by at most 5% .But the cost of living grows by 4.1 % .So in real terms Mr. Average actually became just 0.9% better half . Allowing for inflation, the income of the median house hold in the United States has in fact scarcely changed since 1990, increasing by just 7% in 18 years. Now compare Mr. Average situation with that of Lloyd Blankfein, Chief Executive Officer at Gold Man Sachs, the investment bank. In 2007 he received 68.5 million $ in salary ,bonus and stock awards , an increase of 25% on the previous year , and roughly two thousand times more than Joe Public earned .That same year ,Gold Man Sachs net revenues of 46 billion $ exceeded the entire gross domestic product ( GDP) of more than a hundred countries ,including Cortaid , Serbia and Slovenia: Bolivia ,Ecuador and Guatemala ; Angola ,Syria and Tunisia .The banks total assests for the first time passed the $ I trillion mark .Yet Lloyd Blankfein is far from being the financial worlds highest honor .The veteran hedge fund manager George Sors made 2.9 billion $ . Ken Griffin of Citadil , like the founders of two other leading hedge funds , took home more than two billion $ .Meanwhile , nearly a billion people around the world struggle to get by on just one $ a day. ……………………

    Angry that the world is so unfair? Infuriated by fat-cat capitalist and billion –bonus bankers? Baffled by the yawning chasm between the HAVES ,the Have-nots-and the Have-Yachts? You are not alone .Throughout the history of Western civilization ,there has been a recurrent hostility to finance and financiers ,rooted in the idea that those who make their living from lending money are somehow parasitical on the real economic activities of agriculture and manufacturing …………………………

    Despite our deeply rooted prejudice against filthy lucre, however, money is the root of the most progress ………….THE ASCENT MONEY HAS BEEN ESSENTIAL TO THE ASCENT OF MAN. Far from being the work of mere leeches intent on sucking the life’s blood out of indebted families or gambling with the savings of widows and orphans ,financial innovation has been indispensable factor in man’s advance from wretched subsistence to the giddy heights of material prosperity that so may people know today .


    Behind each great historical phenomenon there lies a financial secret ,and this book sets out to illuminate the most important of these .For example ,the Renaissance created such a boom in the market for art and architecture because Italian bankers like the Medici made fortunes by applying Oriental mathematics to money …………………………….

    Must read book to understand why paradoxically ,the people who live the world’s safest country are also the world’s most insured .You will discover when and why the English speaking people developed their peculiar obsession with buying and selling houses .Perhaps most importantly ,you will see how globalization of finance has ,among many other things ,blurred the old distinction between developed and emerging markets ,turning China into America’s banker – the Communist creditor to he capitalist debtor ,a change of epochal significance .

    ReplyDelete